Systematic distributions of interaction strengths across tree interaction networks yield positive diversity–productivity relationships

GND
1327223953
ORCID
0000-0001-9711-4247
Affiliation
Institute of Biodiversity Friedrich Schiller University Jena Jena Germany
Yu, Wentao;
GND
1294001752
ORCID
0000-0001-5007-2043
Affiliation
Institute of Biodiversity Friedrich Schiller University Jena Jena Germany
Albert, Georg;
GND
1219529370
ORCID
0000-0002-2815-0874
Affiliation
Institute of Biodiversity Friedrich Schiller University Jena Jena Germany
Rosenbaum, Benjamin;
ORCID
0000-0001-8452-4001
Affiliation
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany
Schnabel, Florian;
Affiliation
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany
Bruelheide, Helge;
Affiliation
School of Mathematics and Statistics University College Dublin Dublin 4 Ireland
Connolly, John;
Affiliation
Institute of Ecology Leuphana University of Lüneburg Lüneburg Germany
Härdtle, Werner;
Affiliation
Institute of General Ecology and Environmental Protection Technische Universität Dresden Tharandt Germany
von Oheimb, Goddert;
Affiliation
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany
Trogisch, Stefan;
ORCID
0000-0003-2371-4172
Affiliation
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany
Rüger, Nadja;
GND
1019865490
ORCID
0000-0001-9156-583X
Affiliation
Institute of Biodiversity Friedrich Schiller University Jena Jena Germany
Brose, Ulrich

Understanding the mechanisms underlying diversity–productivity relationships (DPRs) is crucial to mitigating the effects of forest biodiversity loss. Tree–tree interactions in diverse communities are fundamental in driving growth rates, potentially shaping the emergent DPRs, yet remain poorly explored. Here, using data from a large‐scale forest biodiversity experiment in subtropical China, we demonstrated that changes in individual tree productivity were driven by species‐specific pairwise interactions, with higher positive net pairwise interaction effects on trees in more diverse neighbourhoods. By perturbing the interactions strength from empirical data in simulations, we revealed that the positive differences between inter‐ and intra‐specific interactions were the critical determinant for the emergence of positive DPRs. Surprisingly, the condition for positive DPRs corresponded to the condition for coexistence. Our results thus provide a novel insight into how pairwise tree interactions regulate DPRs, with implications for identifying the tree mixtures with maximized productivity to guide forest restoration and reforestation efforts.

Cite

Citation style:
Could not load citation form.

Rights

License Holder: © 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Use and reproduction: