A Newly Developed Orthodontic-Logopedic Screening Procedure for Myofunctional Dysfunctions—A Pilot Study

GND
1042166463
Affiliation
Department of Orthodontics, Center of Dental Medicine, Jena University Hospital, An der Alten Post 4, 07743 Jena, Germany
Hennig, Christoph-Ludwig;
GND
1331099382
Affiliation
Department of Orthodontics, Center of Dental Medicine, Jena University Hospital, An der Alten Post 4, 07743 Jena, Germany
Neumann, Antonia;
GND
1328431827
Affiliation
Department of Orthodontics, Center of Dental Medicine, Jena University Hospital, An der Alten Post 4, 07743 Jena, Germany
Nitzsche, Ann;
GND
1252370725
Affiliation
Department of Orthodontics, Center of Dental Medicine, Jena University Hospital, An der Alten Post 4, 07743 Jena, Germany
Stemmler, Albert;
Affiliation
Praxis of Orthodontics Dr. Knuth Tränckner, Schenckendorfstraße 1, 07318 Saalfeld, Germany
Tränckner, Knuth;
Affiliation
Praxis of Orthodontics Nicola Kühn, Alexander-Puschkin-Platz 3, 99510 Apolda, Germany
Kühn, Nicola;
GND
1216191093
Affiliation
Institute of Medical Statistics, Computer Science and Data Sciences, University of Jena, Bachstraße 18, 07743 Jena, Germany
Lehmann, Thomas;
GND
131607596
Affiliation
Department of Orthodontics, Center of Dental Medicine, Jena University Hospital, An der Alten Post 4, 07743 Jena, Germany
Jacobs, Collin

Interdisciplinary, patient-specific cooperation between orthodontics and speech therapy plays an important role in the therapy of myofunctional dysfunctions. The following orthodontic-logopedic screening procedure is intended to objectify the diagnosis of such dysfunctions and the progress of therapy. A diagnostic questionnaire was prepared based on existing diagnostic questionnaires for myofunctional dysfunction. It contains 32 questions, with a clinical weighting of 0 to 50 points in total. This results in a point score. The lower the score is, the lower the need for therapy is. The study included 108 patients between the ages of 6 and 50 years. After screening, the patient population was divided into Group 0 (score < 15; no speech therapy need; n = 36) and Group 1 (score ≥ 15; a speech therapy need; n = 72). Group 1 was additionally randomized into Subgroups A (with speech therapy; n = 36) and B (without speech therapy; n = 36). After a treatment interval of 6 months, all patients in Group 1 were examined again with the help of the screening procedure. Statistical analysis (SPSS) and significance testing (Mann–Whitney U test) were performed. At baseline, there was no significant difference between patients in Subgroups A and B ( p = 0.157). Subgroup A had a median score of 25, and Subgroup B had a median score of 30. However, after the treatment interval, a significant improvement ( p = 0.001) for Subgroup A with a median score of 11 (mean score difference = 14.67) over Subgroup B with a median score 23 (mean score difference of 7.08) was observed. The developed screening procedure was shown to be equally applicable to all patients and treatment providers. With the help of the scores in point form, the need for speech therapy and the progress of such therapy can be objectified.

Cite

Citation style:
Could not load citation form.

Rights

License Holder: © 2023 by the authors.

Use and reproduction: