Effective or predatory funding? Evaluating the hidden costs of grant applications

ORCID
0000-0001-7441-3818
Affiliation
Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior Nijmegen The Netherlands
Dresler, Martin;
Affiliation
Goethe University Frankfurt Germany
Buddeberg, Eva;
Affiliation
Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms Universität Bonn Germany
Endesfelder, Ulrike;
Affiliation
University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
Haaker, Jan;
Affiliation
Terrestrial Ecology Research Group, TUM School of Life Sciences Technical University of Munich Freising Germany
Hof, Christian;
GND
1237285666
Affiliation
Friedrich Schiller University Jena Germany
Kretschmer, Robert;
Affiliation
University of Stuttgart Stuttgart Germany
Pflüger, Dirk;
ORCID
0000-0002-6807-7464
Affiliation
Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics Garching Germany
Schmidt, Fabian

Researchers are spending an increasing fraction of their time on applying for funding; however, the current funding system has considerable deficiencies in reliably evaluating the merit of research proposals, despite extensive efforts on the sides of applicants, grant reviewers and decision committees. For some funding schemes, the systemic costs of the application process as a whole can even outweigh the granted resources—a phenomenon that could be considered as predatory funding. We present five recommendations to remedy this unsatisfactory situation. image

Cite

Citation style:
Could not load citation form.

Rights

License Holder: Copyright © 2023 Australian and New Zealand Society for Immunology Inc.

Use and reproduction:
This publication is with permission of the rights owner freely accessible due to an Alliance licence and a national licence (funded by the DFG, German Research Foundation) respectively.