Stakeholder engagement to ensure the sustainability of biobanks: a survey of potential users of biobank services

ORCID
0000-0002-8148-5999
Affiliation
German Biobank Node, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Klingler, Corinna;
Affiliation
German Biobank Node, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
von Jagwitz-Biegnitz, Magdaléna;
Affiliation
Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
Baber, Ronny;
ORCID
0000-0002-6801-4498
Affiliation
Gewebebank des Klinikums rechts der Isar und der Technischen Universität München, Am Institut für Pathologie der TU München, München, Germany
Becker, Karl-Friedrich;
Affiliation
RWTH centralized Biomaterial Bank (RWTH cBMB), Institute of Pathology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
Dahl, Edgar;
GND
1314138642
ORCID
0000-0002-8823-8878
Affiliation
Integrated Biobank Jena (IBBJ), Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
Eibner, Cornelius;
Affiliation
Interdisciplinary Bank of Biomaterials and Data Würzburg (ibdw), University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
Fuchs, Jörg;
ORCID
0000-0001-6777-0948
Affiliation
Research Unit of Molecular Epidemiology/Core Facility Biobank, Institute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
Groenewold, Maike K.;
Affiliation
German Biobank Node, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Hartung, Mara Lena;
Affiliation
Central Biobank Charité (ZeBanC), Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Hummel, Michael;
Affiliation
Interdisciplinary Bank of Biomaterials and Data Würzburg (ibdw), University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
Jahns, Roland;
Affiliation
NCT Liquid Biobank, National Center for Tumor Diseases and BioMaterialBank Heidelberg (BMBH), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Kirsten, Romy;
Affiliation
Hannover Unified Biobank, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
Kopfnagel, Verena;
Affiliation
Interdisciplinary Center for Biobanking-Lübeck (ICB-L), University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
Maushagen, Regina;
Affiliation
Central Biobank UMG, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
Nussbeck, Sara Yasemin;
Affiliation
Central Biobank UMG, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
Schoneberg, Anne;
Affiliation
Integrated Research Biobank Greifswald, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
Winter, Theresa;
Affiliation
German Biobank Node, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Specht, Cornelia

Biobanks are important infrastructures facilitating biomedical research. After a decade of rolling out such infrastructures, a shift in attention to the sustainability of biobanks could be observed in recent years. In this regard, an increase in the as yet relatively low utilisation rates of biobanks has been formulated as a goal. Higher utilisation rates can only be achieved if the perspectives of potential users of biobanks—particularly researchers not yet collaborating with biobanks—are adequately considered. To better understand their perspectives, a survey was conducted at ten different research institutions in Germany hosting a centralised biobank. The survey targeted potential users of biobank services, i.e. researchers working with biosamples. It addressed the general demand for biosamples, strategies for biosample acquisition/storage and reasons for/against collaborating with biobanks. In total, 354 researchers filled out the survey. Most interestingly, only a minority of researchers (12%) acquired their biosamples via biobanks. Of the respondents not collaborating with biobanks on sample acquisition, around half were not aware of the (services of the) respective local biobank. Those who actively decided against acquiring biosamples via a biobank provided different reasons. Most commonly, respondents stated that the biosamples required were not available, the costs were too high and information about the available biosamples was not readily accessible. Biobanks can draw many lessons from the results of the survey. Particularly, external communication and outreach should be improved. Additionally, biobanks might have to reassess whether their particular collection strategies are adequately aligned with local researchers’ needs.

Cite

Citation style:
Could not load citation form.

Rights

License Holder: © The Author(s) 2021

Use and reproduction: