Invasive Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of Cerebral VasoSpasm after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (IMCVS)—A Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliation
Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
Vatter, Hartmut;
ORCID
0000-0001-8319-0847
Affiliation
Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
Güresir, Erdem;
Affiliation
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Ulm, Günzburg, 89081 Ulm, Germany
König, Ralph;
ORCID
0000-0001-9018-2458
Affiliation
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Ulm, Günzburg, 89081 Ulm, Germany
Durner, Gregor;
GND
1150790857
Affiliation
Department of Neurosurgery, Jena University Hospital, 07743 Jena, Germany
Kalff, Rolf;
ORCID
0000-0002-5806-2576
Affiliation
Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
Schuss, Patrick;
GND
112398543X
Affiliation
Department of Neuroradiology, Jena University Hospital, 07743 Jena, Germany
Mayer, Thomas E.;
ORCID
0000-0001-9771-7806
Affiliation
Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Konczalla, Jürgen;
ORCID
0000-0002-8392-9004
Affiliation
Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Hattingen, Elke;
Affiliation
Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Seifert, Volker;
Affiliation
Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Berkefeld, Joachim

Cerebral vasospasm (CVS) is associated with delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). The most frequently used form of rescue therapy for CVS is invasive endovascular therapy. Due to a lack of prospective data, we performed a prospective randomized multicenter trial (NCT01400360). A total of 34 patients in three centers were randomized to invasive endovascular treatment or conservative therapy at diagnosis of relevant CVS onset. Imaging data was assessed by a neuroradiologist blinded for treatment allocation. Primary outcome measure was development of DCI. Secondary endpoints included clinical outcome at 6 months after SAH. A total of 18 of the 34 patients were treated conservatively, and 16 patients were treated with invasive endovascular treatment for CVS. There was no statistical difference in the rate of cerebral infarctions either at initial or at the follow-up MRI between the groups. However, the outcome at 6 months was better in patients treated conservatively (mRs 2 ± 1.5 vs. 4 ± 1.8, p = 0.005). Invasive endovascular treatment for CVS does not lead to a lower rate of DCI but might lead to poorer outcomes compared to induced hypertension. The potential benefits of endovascular treatment for CVS need to be addressed in further studies, searching for a subgroup of patients who may benefit.

Cite

Citation style:
Could not load citation form.

Rights

License Holder: © 2022 by the authors.

Use and reproduction: