Expert consensus on the contraindications and cautions of foam rolling : an international delphi study

Affiliation
1 Department of Sport Science and Sport (DSS), FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; katja.kb.bartsch@fau.de
Bartsch, Katja Martina;
ORCID
0000-0001-6258-3537
Affiliation
2 Department of Movement and Training Science, University of Wuppertal, 42119 Wuppertal, Germany; baumgart@uni-wuppertal.de (C.B.); freiwald@uni-wuppertal.de (J.F.)
Baumgart, Christian;
ORCID
0000-0002-3694-6848
Affiliation
2 Department of Movement and Training Science, University of Wuppertal, 42119 Wuppertal, Germany; baumgart@uni-wuppertal.de (C.B.); freiwald@uni-wuppertal.de (J.F.)
Freiwald, Jürgen;
ORCID
0000-0001-9147-2369
Affiliation
3 Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60487 Frankfurt/Main, Germany; wilke@sport.uni-frankfurt.de
Wilke, Jan;
Affiliation
4 Stiftungsuniversität Hildesheim, 31141 Hildesheim, Germany; slomka@uni-hildesheim.de
Slomka, Gunda;
Affiliation
5 Diploma Hochschule, 37242 Bad Sooden-Allendorf, Germany; nasakg@aol.com (S.T.); christoph.egner@diploma.de (C.E.)
Turnhöfer, Sascha;
Affiliation
5 Diploma Hochschule, 37242 Bad Sooden-Allendorf, Germany; nasakg@aol.com (S.T.); christoph.egner@diploma.de (C.E.)
Egner, Christoph;
Affiliation
6 Movement and Training Science, Leipzig University, 04109 Leipzig, Germany; matthias.hoppe@uni-leipzig.de
Hoppe, Matthias W.;
Affiliation
7 SRH Hospital, 72488 Sigmaringen, Germany
Klingler, Werner;
ORCID
0000-0002-1225-0475
Affiliation
8 Experimental Anaesthesiology, Ulm University, 89069 Ulm, Germany; robert.schleip@tum.de
Schleip, Robert

Background: Foam rolling is a type of self-massage using tools such as foam or roller sticks. However, to date, there is no consensus on contraindications and cautions of foam rolling. A methodological approach to narrow that research gap is to obtain reliable opinions of expert groups. The aim of the study was to develop experts’ consensus on contraindications and cautions of foam rolling by means of a Delphi process. Methods: An international three-round Delphi study was conducted. Academic experts, defined as having (co-) authored at least one PubMed-listed paper on foam rolling, were invited to participate. Rounds 1 and 2 involved generation and rating of a list of possible contraindications and cautions of foam rolling. In round 3, participants indicated their agreement on contraindications and cautions for a final set of conditions. Consensus was evaluated using a priori defined criteria. Consensus on contraindications and cautions was considered as reached if more than 70% of participating experts labeled the respective item as contraindication and contraindication or caution, respectively, in round 3. Results: In the final Delphi process round, responses were received from 37 participants. Panel participants were predominantly sports scientists ( n = 21), physiotherapists ( n = 6), and medical professionals ( n = 5). Consensus on contraindications was reached for open wounds (73% agreement) and bone fractures (84%). Consensus on cautions was achieved for local tissue inflammation (97%), deep vein thrombosis (97%), osteomyelitis (94%), and myositis ossificans (92%). The highest impact/severity of an adverse event caused by contraindication/cautions was estimated for bone fractures, deep vein thrombosis, and osteomyelitis. Discussion: The mechanical forces applied through foam rolling can be considered as potential threats leading to adverse events in the context of the identified contraindications and cautions. Further evaluations by medical professionals as well as the collection of clinical data are needed to assess the risks of foam rolling and to generate guidance for different applications and professional backgrounds.

Cite

Citation style:
Could not load citation form.

Rights

License Holder: © 2021 by the authors.

Use and reproduction:
This publication is with permission of the rights owner freely accessible due to an Alliance licence and a national licence (funded by the DFG, German Research Foundation) respectively.